In the alphabet soup of cybersecurity — ranging from SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) to IAM (Identity and Access Management), SOC (Security Operations Center), GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance), and others — DFIR stands out because it handles the post-compromise investigative response rather than preventive measures or policy frameworks. Do you need to add this discipline and all its components to your toolkit? What part does a cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP) play? We’re going beyond the basics on forensics and incident response.

What is Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR)? 

First, a recap: Digital Forensics and Incident Response (DFIR) is a specialized field within cybersecurity centered on detecting, investigating, containing, and remediating security incidents. It’s not a product or a framework: it’s a professional practice area that comes with a set of methodologies for responding to security breaches and cyber incidents.

The discipline of DFIR merges two areas:

Digital forensics: Collecting and analyzing evidence. It can include activities like:

  • Disk imaging and analysis 
  • Log and artifact collection
  • Identifying issues like open network connections
  • Extracting data from smartphones or tablets
What is DFIR? One aspect of digital forensics is continuously monitoring and recording the runtime behavior of cloud-native workloads (e.g., containers running in Kubernetes environments).
One aspect of digital forensics is continuously monitoring and recording the runtime behavior of cloud-native workloads (e.g., containers running in Kubernetes environments).

Incident response: Identifying a breach, containing it, eradicating threats, and resuming normal operations. Examples of incident response include:

  • Monitoring alerts and logs for breaches in progress
  • Blocking malicious IP addresses
  • Isolating infected hosts from the network 
  • Coordinating external response teams when needed
  • Testing systems post-restoration 
Automated, environment-aware containment capability supporting the critical incident response goal of minimizing damage and a core component of DFIR
Automated, environment-aware containment capability supporting the critical incident response goal of minimizing damage while the investigation and remediation steps are carried out.

Both branches are dedicated to legally sound evidence handling: DFIR serves to enable strict adherence to legally defensible standards for evidence collection, preservation, and analysis. It also helps organizations stay compliant and recover faster after breaches.

DFIR emerged from multiple fields, including: 

  • Early computer forensics work by law enforcement 
  • Academic research 
  • Formalized incident response teams in cybersecurity in the 1990s and early 2000s 

Enterprise DFIR units have become common in highly regulated industries like finance and healthcare, and they include professionals like forensic analysts, incident responders, and threat hunters. 

But in every industry, today’s DFIR goes beyond threat detection. It requires in-depth technical analysis of compromised systems to uncover the full extent and nature of a breach to drive improved overall security. So while many capabilities of tools like cloud-native application protection platforms (CNAPPs) aid in DFIR, the discipline also goes beyond its tools to include the professional teams and best practices that analyze incidents and implement improved security.

E-BOOK

The TL;DR on CNAPP

Want the actual TL;DR on CNAPP (hint – it starts with runtime security)? Don’t spend days reading someone’s PhD dissertation – check out our comprehensive 8 step CNAPP guide.

Get the E-Book

How DFIR Works

Tools like CNAPPS can take on some of the responsibilities in a broad DFIR ecosystem, providing valuable telemetry, detection, and some response actions that help manage incidents — and the automations to sort through it, making sense of complicated incidents in a sea of data, faster.

67% of DFIR professionals say their role has been impacted by growing reporting obligations, and 21% “strongly agree” they feel burnt out at their jobs.

Automating and organizing some of the duties of collecting, analyzing, an organizing large amounts of data can help.

Primarily, CNAPPs provide:

  • Monitoring for the runtime activity of containers, microservices, and cloud workloads.
  • Identification of suspicious behaviors or anomalies that might indicate an attack in progress.
  • Enablement of quick response action, including automation (e.g., isolating containers, adjusting network policies).

Let’s break down the areas of both digital forensics and incident response to see where and how CNAPP tools do the heavy lifting and what companies add to the mix as a security incident unfolds.

Digital forensics categories and activities

1. Disk Imaging and Analysis

  • Bit-by-Bit Copies: Preserving exact replicas of storage media for safe, offline analysis.
  • File Recovery & Metadata: Retrieving deleted files and examining timestamps or permissions to build event timelines.

2. Memory Forensics

  • RAM Capture: Capturing volatile system state to identify hidden processes or encryption keys.
  • Process Enumeration: Finding suspicious running processes and injected code fragments.

3. Network Traffic Analysis

  • Packet Review: Examining captured traffic to detect malicious communications.
  • Session Reconstruction: Rebuilding interactions (like web sessions) to trace attacker activity.

4. Log and Artifact Examination

  • System & App Logs: Cross-referencing OS and application logs to find anomalies.
  • Browser & Registry Checks: Inspecting user activity artifacts for evidence of compromise.

5. Malware Analysis

  • Static Review: Examining suspicious files without running them.
  • Behavioral Testing (Sandboxing): Running the malware in a controlled environment to observe its actions.

6. Communication Forensics 

  • Header Analysis: Confirming the source and authenticity of suspicious messages.
  • Attachment Inspection: Finding hidden malware in attached files, as in email.

7. Mobile Device Forensics

  • Data Extraction: Retrieving call logs, chats, and geolocation data.
  • App Analysis: Understanding what sensitive information mobile apps may hold or have leaked.

8. Chain of Custody and Reporting

  • Evidence Integrity: Making sure data remains unaltered and well-documented.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Documenting methods, findings, and conclusions for legal or internal review.

Here are some of the key category actions and how CNAPPs with Cloud Detection & Response capabilities fit into the workflow:

Forensic CategoryExample ActionCNAPP/CDR Complement
Disk and MemoryCapture volatile data to identify hidden processesRuntime telemetry pinpoints suspicious container activity before ephemeral data is lost
Network TrafficAnalyze suspicious traffic flowsContinuous visibility finds abnormal patterns and correlates them with specific cloud workloads
Logs & ArtifactsCross-reference OS, app, and registry logsCentralized, immutable logging helps with correlation and timeline construction across cloud resources
Malware AnalysisObserve malware in a controlled sandboxBehavior-based detection flags malicious runtime actions for deeper analysis
Chain of CustodyMaintain evidence integrity for legal useComprehensive audit trails make changes and remediation traceable

A CNAPP can assist digital forensics efforts by preserving logs, network activity details, and runtime events in a dynamic cloud environment. 

That support can aid investigators in understanding an attacker’s actions, correlate incidents across ephemeral resources, and gather clues that guide deeper forensic work. However, tools like CNAPPs don’t replace forensics tools and practices that handle disk imaging, memory capture, or malware reverse engineering. 

Ultimately, CNAPPs complement the forensics arm of DFIR by providing the cloud-native visibility needed to conduct effective investigations in modern infrastructures.

Incidence Response categories and activities

1. Preparation

  • Playbook Development: Define clear response steps and escalation paths.
  • Tooling & Drills: Deploy SIEM/EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) tools and run tabletop exercises to ensure readiness.

2. Detection & Analysis

  • Alert Validation: Distinguish true compromises from false positives.
  • Scope & Intelligence: Identify affected systems and leverage threat intel for context.

3. Containment

  • Isolation: Quarantine compromised hosts and limit attacker movement.
  • Access Control: Restrict or reset credentials to cut off intrusion avenues.

4. Eradication

  • Threat Removal: Clean or rebuild infected machines.
  • Fix Root Issues: Patch vulnerabilities and tighten configurations.

5. Recovery

  • Restore Services: Bring validated systems back online from trusted backups.
  • Verify Integrity: Test systems post-restoration.

6. Lessons Learned

  • Root-Cause Review: Understand how and why the incident occurred.
  • Process Improvements: Update playbooks, controls, and training to prevent recurrences.

In incident response, CNAPPs have a part to play at each stage:

IR PhaseExample ActionCNAPP/CDR Complement
PreparationDefine playbooks, set up toolsAutomated guardrails make for consistent, secure initial configurations
Detection/AnalysisValidate alerts, scoop incidentsBehavior analytics and contextual alerts speed root-cause discovery
ContainmentQuarantine infected systemsPolicy-driven isolation of cloud workloads limits lateral movement instantly
EradicationRemove malware, patch vulnerabilitiesGuided remediation and automated policy enforcement eradicate threats at scale
RecoveryRestore systems, verify integritySecure baselines and continuous validation so only compliant workloads run
Lessons LearnedUpdate playbooks, improve controlsAttack data guides strategic changes and faster response next time

A CNAPP shines in securing cloud workloads, containers, and Kubernetes deployments, providing capabilities that align closely with certain incident response stages, especially in dynamic, cloud-native environments. 

For example, in the detection phase, CNAPPs using CDR capabilities can spot deviations from known-good states, suspicious API calls, unusual network traffic, or anomalous privilege escalations. It all shortens the time to containment, reducing an attacker’s opportunity to move laterally.

During eradication, CNAPPs can identify vulnerabilities and misconfigurations and prioritize patching, or automatically shut down potentially malicious practices. It can apply updated policies to lock down future workloads, too. For example, a CNAPP might prevent vulnerable images from being redeployed or enforce stricter runtime constraints, so eradication efforts lead to lasting improvements rather than temporary fixes.

In recovery, CNAPPs offer the visibility to assure teams that workloads match new, secure configurations and demonstrate organizations are learning lessons for future incidents, refining policies based on what they discovered.

To be sure, there are many legal and forensic measures and team members in DFIR that lie outside the realm of what modern security tools provide. However, these tools can form the backbone of identification and response, helping DFIR teams work smarter.

Sophisticated and Advanced Threats

Working smarter is a cornerstone of advancing DFIR methodologies. After all, today’s most sophisticated threats are what shape the priorities and depth of a modern DFIR strategy. So let’s discuss a few advanced attacks and how they’ve created a DFIR playbook that needs to be both intelligent and scalable (and what that looks like).

Zero Day Attacks

In a zero-day attack, assailants can use previously unknown vulnerabilities to breach defenses before patches exist, so DFIR teams have to be able to handle fluid, evolving situations. 

What to do: Embrace behavior-based detection and environment-aware policies so unfamiliar exploit activity can be flagged early. Use automation so that suspect workloads are automatically isolated. That lets responders swiftly contain the threat and confidently restore normal operations once applying patches.

Supply Chain Attacks

Attackers may infiltrate through trusted third parties or widely used software components, so DFIR strategies have to extend beyond an organization’s own perimeter.

What to do: Trace and validate every component entering your environment. An SBOM explorer helps prevent suspicious or unverified components from ever reaching production. It provides the granular visibility needed to quickly quarantine compromised containers, roll back deployments to safe versions, and reinforce policies that keep vulnerable components out of the CI/CD pipeline. 

Advanced Persistent Attacks

Patient, well-resourced, and highly skilled attackers can tailor their techniques to evade standard defenses. They might blend in for months, steal intellectual property, and pivot through cloud workloads undetected. 

What to do: Use behavior-based analytics along with external threat intelligence frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK. Behavior-based monitoring correlates events across workloads, APIs, and network traffic, surfacing patterns that map to known TTPs. If linked to a recognized APT, tailored response actions, like disabling compromised credentials or enforcing stricter micro-segmentation, are triggered automatically. Over time, these intelligence-driven insights refine policies, helping the environment resist similar tactics better in the future.

Upwind Supports Better DFIR 

With added forensic visibility, streamlined evidence handling, rapid incident response, automated containment and eradication, and integrated behavioral analysis for improved threat intelligence, Upwind contributes to a strong DFIR strategy.

To turn your cloud-native or hybrid ecosystem into a transparent, defensible environment, start by scheduling a demo.

FAQ

What is the difference between EDR and DFIR?

EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) is a key defensive tool, while DFIR is a comprehensive, process-oriented discipline that uses tools like EDR, plus other investigative tools.

EDR provides continuous endpoint monitoring, but it’s focused on endpoints and uses automation and tools to handle its job: stopping endpoint-level threats quickly.

DFIR embraces tools, but it also requires expertise, multidisciplinary teams, and a suite of methodological approaches and strategies. It’s focused on incidents, from detection to analysis and recovery.

What is the use case of DFIR?

Why deploy such a broad and resource-heavy strategy to incident response? Because an organization suspects a security breach, detects abnormal network activity, or discovers compromised systems.

Its primary use case is to identify the scope of the attack, preserve and analyze digital evidence, contain the threat, remove malicious artifacts, restore normal operations, and ultimately improve defenses to prevent similar incidents in the future. 

Ultimately, DFIR turns security incidents into learning opportunities, enhancing the organization’s overall cybersecurity posture.

What are the steps of DFIR?

When referencing the steps or phases of DFIR, it’s the incident response stages that are usually at play:

  1. Preparation: Developing response plans, implementing tools, and training teams
  2. Detection and Identification: Discovering potential security incidents through alerts, logs, and threat intelligence
  3. Analysis and Investigation: Gathering evidence, correlating data, and determining the scope and nature of incidents.
  4. Containment: Isolating affected systems, limiting attacker movement, and preventing further damage.
  5. Eradication: Removing malware, patching exploited vulnerabilities, and resolving root causes.
  6. Recovery: Restoring systems, verifying integrity, and bringing operations back online.
  7. Post-Incident Review: Documenting findings, refining processes and policies, and implementing improvements to prevent future incidents.

Various reputable frameworks like NIST define similar but not identical phases, and organizations can adjust these steps to their needs.